Khrushchev: Stuck in the Past

Nikita Khrushchev was a very “forceful”, as James von Geldern would put it, critic of the arts. He was quite threatened by any new or unfamiliar styles of art, and would immediately present those thoughts to the artist, egged on by his colleagues. With the vast new styles of modern art and music developing in the early 60s, Khrushchev, worried and confused by these trends, would give his crudest opinions to the artists right there at the exhibitions.

Khrushchev (1963)

At the Manege Exhibit on December 1, 1962, here are just a few of Khrushchev’s opinions on music and art he encountered:

“I would say that this is just a mess…It consisted of some messy yellow lines which looked, if you will excuse me, as though some child had done his business on the canvas when his mother was away and then spread it around with his hands.”

“I don’t like jazz. When I hear jazz, it’s as if I had gas on the stomach. I used to think it was static when I heard it on the radio.”

“Or take these new dances which are so fashionable now. Some of them are completely improper. You wiggle a certain section of the anatomy, if you’ll pardon the expression. It’s indecent.”

“As long as I am president of the Council of Ministers, we are going to support a genuine art. We aren’t going to give a kopeck for pictures painted by jackasses.”

“He can paint and sell these if he wants, but we don’t need them. We are going to take these blotches with us into communism, are we?”

“But who ordered it? And why? This painting shouldn’t have been hung in the exhibition.”

“It’s a pity, of course, that your mother is dead, but maybe it’s lucky for her that she can’t see how her son is spending his time.”

“People tell me that I am behind the times and don’t realize it, that our contemporary artists will be appreciated in 100 years.”

The last quote stuck out to me, because it was what I was thinking the entire time reading his thoughts. He is stuck in the past and has zero respect for any new types of art forms, but to him and others art was all about staying within the tradition of Soviet socialist art. We see this all the time even today that the older generation, not all but a lot, want to stay within tradition and anything else is too out of the box and wrong.

Breakfast by A. Vasnetsov

In a different article, the December 1st exhibition is mentioned to be “in honor of the 30th anniversary of the Moscow branch of the Artists’ Union.” This exhibition had more than 2,000 works of art on display, and was created by Moscow artists over a 30-year period. The art varied in theme, style, and technique, and were created by masters of art as well as newcomers. More than 100,000 people had visited the exhibition and there was great interest in it. However, we’ve already seen above some of the comments Khrushchev made that night. The more traditional crowd discussed how many works deviated from the Soviet socialist art. When asked what he thought of the exhibition as a whole Khrushchev’s response was:

“In a number of cases it would appear that the organizers of the exhibition have fallen under the sway of those who defend weak and unacceptable works, who have manifested liberalism. Such a policy cannot lead to a further upsurge Of the Soviet art of socialist realism.”

At the end of the night Khrushchev stated that yes these artists are creative, but people don’t understand it, and therefore will reject it. If we can’t tell if a man or a donkey created this art, the artist needs to “work for the people.” A few months later in March 1963 he did a similar thing with music. He created a “Declaration on Music in Soviet Society,” where he essentially said we’re not going to ban your music, but we’re going to tell you what’s bad about it and what you should be listening to:

“No one proposes to declare a ban on any of these styles and genres. But we want to stipulate our own attitude towards music, its tasks and its creative direction.”

“Of course, I have no pretensions to claim that my feeling for music should become a general norm for everyone. But we refuse to encourage people who pass off cacophony for real melody and who regard music universally loved by the people as obsolete.”

Overall Khrushchev says that though he isn’t banning what we can listen to, we should really be careful because anything new and modern is hard to take in and indecent. That we need music that is going to inspire soldiers to be heroes and that we need this political stand in our art and music.

Khrushchev was just really stuck in this traditional mindset that life and art were so linked together that people couldn’t be creative and create something other than Soviet socialist art. Khrushchev actually ended one artists’ career and lost him his studio. After Khrushchev’s death in 1971 his family actually hired that man, Ernst Neizvestnyi, to create the memorial for his grave.


Gravestone for Nikita Khrushchev by Ernst Neizvestnyi (1971)


5 thoughts on “Khrushchev: Stuck in the Past

  1. Such an interesting post! I did not know anything about Khrushchev. I learned that he is a very unique man based on i his comments and how much he rejected people’s creativity. He was very critical. Do you believe him being this critical was beneficial or did it just turn people away from wanting to come up with new ideas?


  2. This was a great post! I loved how you included the some of the things the he said to artists, it really added to your post. Each time I read a quote of his it sounded like something you would hear grandparents saying about today’s music. From my post this week, which was about the double burden, and your post it seems like a common theme was people wanting to break the ideas of tradition, but finding it very difficult to actually do so.


  3. This was a really good post! I found the quotes very useful and interesting. I had no idea that Khrushchev had such opinions on art or such a lack of appreciation for creativity. With all that was growing and changing for their nation at the time, the insight into a more artistic aspect of culture made for a good read!


  4. Great post this week! The quotes really bring out the poignancy of the situation and help make the post resonate on a more personal level. It is very interesting to trace the arts across Russian, and Soviet history. A people that is naturally very diverse produced some of the most unique art, but due to the socialist agenda, certain creativity was hindered during the USSR’s peak. It is interesting to see how Khrushchev really did work to shut down anything that did not push the socialist agenda.


  5. Khrushchev’s hostility to modern art is striking because his path to power depended in part on repudiating the excesses of the Stalinist system. Khrushchev’s disdain for experimental art was partially a reflection of his growing conservatism, but also of his utilitarian attitude that valued simple messages at the expense of imagination and creativity.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s